Really, really nice. That scrolling window with the blog in it was making me go slowly stark raving mad. Vast improvement, model for a music community site. Wish I'd built it.
What has been the reaction to the new site? I have to say that design-wise I think it's a bit of a mess.
If you look at the blog section, you have each thread separated by a thin black line, then the thread title followed by a thick black line (should be the other way around, surely?).
Then, if you look at an actual thread, it looks weird to allow each contributor to give a title to his own contribution. Makes it look like a new thread.
Also, would it be possible to separate threads started by readers from those started by the magazine's own writers? I know Word's readers are a pretty smart bunch but I have no desire to read threads started by them, whereas I am interested in contributions by the likes of Andrew Harrison or Rob Fitzpatrick.
it looks fantastic! excellent work there...
ReplyDeleteReally, really nice. That scrolling window with the blog in it was making me go slowly stark raving mad. Vast improvement, model for a music community site. Wish I'd built it.
ReplyDeleteWhat has been the reaction to the new site? I have to say that design-wise I think it's a bit of a mess.
ReplyDeleteIf you look at the blog section, you have each thread separated by a thin black line, then the thread title followed by a thick black line (should be the other way around, surely?).
Then, if you look at an actual thread, it looks weird to allow each contributor to give a title to his own contribution. Makes it look like a new thread.
Also, would it be possible to separate threads started by readers from those started by the magazine's own writers? I know Word's readers are a pretty smart bunch but I have no desire to read threads started by them, whereas I am interested in contributions by the likes of Andrew Harrison or Rob Fitzpatrick.